State v. Norton
Citations
- 2019 ND 191
- 930 N.W.2d 635
Syllabus
The district court did not err by failing to require the State to name a specific individual who was threatened to establish a prima facie case of terrorizing. The district court did not err by failing to require the State to name a specific individual who was threatened in jury instructions regarding the crime of terrorizing. The evidence was sufficient to support the defendant's conviction of terrorizing, and the court did not err in denying his motion for acquittal.
Judges: Jensen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. HoweNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1976-11-26· cited 73×
- State v. CarlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-07-25· cited 51×
- State v. HassNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1978-05-24· cited 46×
- State v. RourkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2017-04-25· cited 24×
- State v. RomeroNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2013-05-14· cited 17×
- State v. LaibNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2005-11-09· cited 15×
- State v. BearrunnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2019-01-22· cited 14×
- State v. WangstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2018-09-25· cited 12×
- State v. ZenoNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1992-10-01· cited 11×
- State v. MohamudNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2019-04-11· cited 10×
- State v. FinnemanNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2018-08-28· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.