State v. Mohamud

Citations

• 2019 ND 101
• 925 N.W.2d 396

Syllabus

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying the motion to dismiss for undue delay. The district court did not err as a matter of law and did not come to any erroneous factual determinations in finding the defendant's right to a speedy trial was not violated. Evidence was sufficient to support guilty verdicts. No-contact order was properly considered a condition of probation.