Skip to main content

State v. Nixon

Citations

  • 384 N.E.2d 152
  • 270 Ind. 192

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that pari-mutuel wagering on horse races was unconstitutional
  • holding that pari-mutuel wagering on horse races was unconstitutional
  • declaring that pari-mutuel wagering on horse races was unconstitutional
  • “It would not be practicable, if possible, in a written constitution, to specify in detail all its objects and purposes, or the means by which they are to be carried into effect.”
  • addressing substantially identically-worded predecessor to current Appellate Rule 17(A)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Prentice, Givan, Pivarnik, Debruler, Hunter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.