State v. Nix
Citations
- 218 N.E.3d 983
- 2023 Ohio 1143
Syllabus
Crim.R. 48(B) dismissal with prejudice abuse of discretion violation of statutory or constitutional right bar further prosecution. Where there was nothing in the record to indicate that any statutory or constitutional right was violated that would bar further prosecution of defendant, trial court abused its discretion in dismissing case with prejudice because it disliked the state's plan to wait until the alleged victim was 18 (when the state could contact alleged victim directly and avoid the intervention of her guardian) to discuss prosecution of the case. Case remanded with instructions to vacate dismissal with prejudice and enter dismissal without prejudice.
Judges: E.A. Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2006-06-19· cited 4,179×
- Michigan v. BryantSupreme Court· 2011-02-28· cited 1,277×
- State v. ArnoldOhio Supreme Court· 2010-06-17· cited 197×
- State v. BuschOhio Supreme Court· 1996-10-09· cited 94×
- State v. DunnOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-08-06· cited 29×
- State v. TroisiOhio Supreme Court· 2022-10-11· cited 27×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-06-28· cited 10×
- State v. HollinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-08-25· cited 8×
- In re H.P.P.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-08-06· cited 7×
- State v. StrongOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-09-25· cited 6×
- State v. MillsOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-08-09· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.