Skip to main content
· 8/6/2020

In re H.P.P.

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 3974

Syllabus

Testimony by Skype right to confrontation justification of remote testimony harmless error. The record shows the trial court took precautions to ensure that the remote testimony did not violate appellant's right to confrontation. Therefore, even if we were to find that the state did not sufficiently justify a witness testifying remotely, there is no reasonable possibility that the remote testimony contributed to appellant's conviction. The trial court's admission of the remote testimony was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.

Judges: Sheehan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.