Skip to main content

State v. Nieves

Citations

  • 160 N.H. 245
  • 999 A.2d 389

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that there is no longer an “inadvertency” requirement under the State Constitution with respect to “drugs, weapons, and other items dangerous in themselves” (quotation omitted)
  • explaining that the initial intrusion which afforded the view of the item must have been lawful, meaning the intrusion must have been justified by a warrant or an exception to the warrant requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Broderick, Conboy, Dalianis, Duggan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.