State v. Nicholson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the apprehension must be felt by the victim, not some other person and that where the victim is a child who is too young to understand the danger, it is not relevant if someone else feared for the child's safety
• holding that the apprehension must be felt by the victim, not some other person and that where the victim is a child who is too young to understand the danger, it is not relevant if someone else feared for the child’s safety
• overruled on other grounds by State v. Smith, 159 Wn.2d 778, 154 P.3d 873 (2007)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Smith
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-03-15· cited 151×
• State v. Elmi
  Washington Supreme Court· 2009-05-21· cited 124×
• State v. Winings
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-02-23· cited 98×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-11-30· cited 19×
• State v. Nicholson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-01-13· cited 1×
• State v. Nicholson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2003-11-24

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re WINSHIP
  Supreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
• State v. Salinas
  Washington Supreme Court· 1992-05-21· cited 1,796×
• State v. Kitchen
  Washington Supreme Court· 2004-07-06· cited 499×
• State v. Bland
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1993-09-27· cited 57×
• State v. Romero
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-10-03· cited 57×
• State v. Hupe
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1988-01-08· cited 33×
• State v. Rivas
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-09-13· cited 27×
• State v. Thorpe
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1988-05-31· cited 11×
• State v. Byrd
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1994-01-31· cited 10×