Ohio Court of Appeals· 10/11/2022
State v. Newman
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 3607
Syllabus
Because defendant-appellant's sentence was recommended jointly and authorized by law, defendant-appellant's sentence was not subject to review. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by imposing the remainder of defendant-appellant's post-release control as a prison term.
Judges: Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court· 1948-06-14· cited 1,667×
- State v. UnderwoodOhio Supreme Court· 2010-01-05· cited 724×
- State v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court· 2005-07-06· cited 224×
- State v. Sergent (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-04-27· cited 162×
- State v. NienbergOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-05-22· cited 63×
- State v. HeraldOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-11-14· cited 11×
- State v. MorrisOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-04-29· cited 10×
- State v. WardlowOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-12-30· cited 7×
- State v. MillsOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-08-15· cited 6×
- State v. HolbrookOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-08-17· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.