State v. Nettles
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 4908
Syllabus
In a drug-trafficking case, the judge who issued the interception warrant in the county where the cell phone was located had jurisdiction, the application for the interception warrant complied with R.C. 2933.53, and the warrant was supported by sufficient probable cause of criminal activity. Motion to suppress evidentiary hearing consecutive sentences maximum sentence judicial fact-finding.
Judges: Pietrykowski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court· 2003-10-22· cited 2,261×
- State v. FanningOhio Supreme Court· 1982-07-14· cited 2,064×
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. GeorgeOhio Supreme Court· 1989-09-27· cited 672×
- Cline v. Ohio Bureau of Motor VehiclesOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-10· cited 167×
- United States v. DenmanFifth Circuit· 1996-11-15· cited 76×
- United States v. HenleyEighth Circuit· 2014-12-04· cited 67×
- Bertha Huff v. Carol SpawSixth Circuit· 2015-07-21· cited 20×
- State v. McCormickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-09-25· cited 9×
- Szuch v. FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-02-19· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.