Bertha Huff v. Carol Spaw

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering a claim for invasion of privacy under 18 U. S. C. § 2520 (a), which authorizes a private right of action for money damages, arising from an administrative assistant’s listening in on a supervisor’s conversations
• “Congress did not enact Title III to protect every face-to-face conversation from interception.”
• “Congress did not enact Title III to protect every face-to-face conversation from interception.”
• “Title III provides injured parties with a private right of action against violators.”
• “Title III provides injured parties with a private right of action against violators.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).