Skip to main content

State v. Nesmith

Citations

  • 551 P.2d 896
  • 220 Kan. 146
  • 1976 Kan. LEXIS 462

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Failure to instruct on “the element of value” in a theft case was not error under the circumstances. [Emphasis added.]
  • fact that defendant was found carrying property away from victim’s residence was sufficient to establish burglary conviction even though defendant was never seen inside the residence
  • owners of burglarized house were asleep upstairs when defendant burglarized the house
  • test applied to determine whether photographic identification was impermissibly suggestive
  • test applied to determine whether photographic identification was impermissibly suggestive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Foth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.