Skip to main content

State v. Nelson

Citations

  • 39 Wash. 221
  • 81 P. 721
  • 1905 Wash. LEXIS 847

Syllabus

<p>Criminal Law—Adultery—Information—Erroneous Designation of Offense—Living in a State of Adultery. An information plainly charging the offense of living in a state of adultery, is not defective on account of a recitation erroneously designating the offense as the crime of adultery, which is not punishable under our statutes.</p> <p>Same—Certainty. An information is not uncertain in that it may charge the offenses of adultery, living in a state of adultery, cohabitation, or lewdness, when the intent to charge the offense of living in a state of adultery is plain to a person of common understanding.</p> <p>Same. Such an information is not bad for duplicity.</p> <p>Same—Parties Defendant. In a prosecution for living in a state of adultery, it is not necessary to join the alleged paramour as a defendant.</p> <p>Same—Certainty as to Time. An information for living in a state of adultery, charging the commission of the crime between certain dates, is not uncertain as to time.</p> <p>Criminal Law—Orders-—Recitals—Copy of Information. An order of arraignment reciting the delivery of a copy of the information cannot be contradicted by ex parte affidavits.</p> <p>Same—Adultery—Evidence of Previous Acts. In a prosecution for living in a state of adultery, the conduct of the parties previous to the date charged may be shown.</p> <p>Same—Marriage of Paramour—Harmless Error. In a prosecution for living in a state of adultery, the state has a right to prove the marriage of the alleged paramour and the absence of her husband, as part of the surrounding circumstances; and if the marriage was immaterial, it was not prejudicial.</p> <p>Same — Adultery of Paramour — Birth of Child — Harmless Error. In a prosecution for living in a state of adultery with a married woman, it is competent for the state to prove that she gave birth to a child more than twenty months after she had seen or cohabited with her husband, as one step toward proving the ultimate fact of adultery with the accused

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • testimony of a witness present at wedding ceremony is sufficient evidence of marriage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crow, Dunbar, Fullerton, Hadley, Hoot, Mount, Rudkin, Tbe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.