Price v. Scott
Citations
- 13 Wash. 574
- 43 P. 634
- 1896 Wash. LEXIS 90
Syllabus
<p>PRINCIPAL AND SURETY—LIABILITY OF SURETY—ESTOPPEL BY RECITALS IN BOND—AMENDMENT OF ANSWER—ADMISSION OF EVIDENCE.</p> <p>The sureties upon a bond given by a contractor for the erection of a school building, under the statute requiring such bond, for the protection of those furnishing labor and materials to a contractor employed in making public improvements, are estopped to deny the authority of the school district to make the contract, when the bond executed by such sureties recites as a fact that the principal in the bond had duly entered into a contract with the school district for the erection of said school building.</p> <p>Refusal of the court to allow defendant to amend his answer upon an application therefor made after the plaintiff’s testimony has been introduced, is not an abuse of the court’s discretion in such matters.</p> <p>The improper admission of evidence is not error, unless objection thereto on the proper grounds is raised at the time.</p>
Judges: Scott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court· 1905-07-18· cited 28×
- Holly Street Land Co. v. BeyerWashington Supreme Court· 1908-02-10· cited 10×
- Moran Bros. v. Northern Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court· 1898-04-25· cited 7×
- Kroenert v. FalkWashington Supreme Court· 1903-07-08· cited 2×
- Greene v. FinnellWashington Supreme Court· 1900-02-20· cited 1×
- Washington Mill Co. v. MarksWashington Supreme Court· 1902-01-04
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Other cases named Price v. Scott
4 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.