Supreme Court of Vermont· 11/12/1999
State v. Nelson
Citations
- 742 A.2d 1248
- 170 Vt. 125
- 1999 Vt. LEXIS 332
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that probation is “an essential tool in the court’s ability to shape a criminal sentence to the rehabilitative needs of the individual defendant”
- noting that sentencing, including the imposition of conditions of probation, is an inherently judicial function
- criminal sentencing by trial court will be upheld if reasonably related to crime for which defendant was convicted
- “While not without limitation, a trial court’s discretion in this context is expansive, and will generally be upheld if the probation condition is reasonably related to the crime for which the defendant was convicted.”
- “While not without limitation, a trial court’s discretion in this context is expansive, and will generally be upheld if the probation condition is reasonably related to the crime for which the defendant was convicted.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Amestoy, Dooley, Morse, Johnson, Skoglund
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re CarterSupreme Court of Vermont· 2004-02-27· cited 74×
- State v. Billy Joe PutnamSupreme Court of Vermont· 2015-09-04· cited 28×
- Meyer v. State State v. RiveraCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2015-12-22· cited 25×
- Hunter v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont· 2004-10-22· cited 19×
- State v. Willy LevittSupreme Court of Vermont· 2016-05-27· cited 16×
- State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Vermont· 2015-03-27· cited 14×
- Baum v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2001-03-30· cited 5×
- State v. PrattSupreme Court of Vermont· 2002-01-28· cited 4×
- State v. PowersSupreme Court of Vermont· 2001-12-26· cited 3×
- State v. NolenSupreme Court of Vermont· 2012-12-28· cited 2×
- State v. Ryan R. HoveySupreme Court of Vermont· 2021-08-27· cited 1×
- Noble v. Sec'y of StateVermont Superior Court· 2010-10-21
- CLF Stormwater DischargeVermont Superior Court· 2008-08-28
- Paige v. State of VermontVermont Superior Court· 2018-03-16
- Michele Morin and Karen Rowell v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont· 2026-05-15
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court· 1952-06-02· cited 1,646×
- Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court· 1977-06-28· cited 1,340×
- People v. NavarroCalifornia Supreme Court· 1972-05-23· cited 185×
- State v. WhitchurchSupreme Court of Vermont· 1990-05-25· cited 34×
- In re D.L.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1995-09-22· cited 26×
- State v. EmerySupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-04-19· cited 20×
- City of Detroit v. Del RioMichigan Court of Appeals· 1968-04-22· cited 19×
- People v. DickensMichigan Court of Appeals· 1985-07-01· cited 14×
- Brock v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1983-01-04· cited 11×
- Sheppard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-12-12· cited 10×
- State v. HaleSupreme Court of Vermont· 1979-04-03· cited 8×
- In the Interest of A. H. S.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-12-05· cited 6×
- Commonwealth v. KlineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-06-24· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.