Skip to main content
· 12/5/1996

In the Interest of A. H. S.

Citations

  • 479 S.E.2d 157
  • 223 Ga. App. 824
  • 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 4428
  • 1996 Ga. App. LEXIS 1297

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • relying on Brock to uphold trial court’s probation condition limiting right to operate motor vehicle beyond statutory suspension period
  • relying on Brock to uphold trial court's probation condition limiting right to operate motor vehicle beyond statutory suspension period
  • discussing a juvenile court’s authority, under former OCGA § 15-11-35 (a) (2), to place a child on probation “‘under conditions and limitations the court prescribes’”
  • construing prior version of OCGA § 15-11-66 and holding that “after a dispositional hearing, a juvenile court finding a child in need of treatment or rehabilitation can make any dispositional orders provided under [the Code section]”
  • construing prior version of OCGA § 15-11-66 and holding that “after a dispositional hearing, a juvenile court finding a child in need of treatment or rehabilitation can make any dispositional orders provided under [the code section]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Andrews, Pope, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.