State v. Nance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that evidence that the appellant had fallen significantly below her ideal weight at one point during the prior six weeks did not establish that she was unable to meet her basic needs
• commitment not allowed based on conjecture

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Brungard
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-03-28· cited 40×
• State v. Ayala
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-12-15· cited 39×
• State v. Jayne
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-05-09· cited 31×
• Morris v. Nance
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-12-28· cited 26×
• State v. Woolridge
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-04-25· cited 25×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• O'Neill v. O'Neill
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1976-01-22· cited 153×
• Cook v. Michael
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1958-10-24· cited 109×
• Matter of Christofferson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-08-25· cited 16×
• Matter of Fletcher
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-12-08· cited 14×