Alaska Supreme Court· 10/12/1979
State v. Myers
Citations
- 601 P.2d 239
- 1979 Alas. LEXIS 572
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that \a warrantless search will be considered per se unreasonable unless it falls within a previously recognized exception to the warrant requirement\
- stating that \a warrantless search will be considered per se unreasonable unless it falls within a previously recognized exception to the warrant requirement\
- discussing Schraff's listing of exceptions to warrant requirement and concluding only emergency aid exception possible under facts of case
- discussing Schraff 's listing of exceptions to warrant requirement and concluding only emergency aid exception possible under facts of case
- rejecting respondents’ claim that ‘‘officers’ failure to attempt to contact the theatre owner prior to entering the building rendered the entry unrea- sonable’’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rabinowitz, Boochever, Rabi-Nowitz, Connor, Burke, Matthews
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. Ronald Joseph Bute, United States of America v. Beverly Bute, A/K/A Beverly M. York, A/K/A Beverly M. JensenTenth Circuit· 1994-12-23· cited 85×
- State v. MendezSupreme Court of Kansas· 2003-04-18· cited 37×
- Gallmeyer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1982-02-18· cited 31×
- People v. GardnerAppellate Court of Illinois· 1984-02-01· cited 26×
- Chilton v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1980-05-09· cited 21×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1983-04-29· cited 21×
- Anchorage Police Department Employees Ass'n v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court· 2001-06-15· cited 20×
- State v. SwensonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-11-13· cited 20×
- State v. GibsonAlaska Supreme Court· 2012-01-13· cited 12×
- Beltz v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 2009-12-18· cited 9×
- People v. HoffstetterAppellate Court of Illinois· 1984-11-02· cited 6×
- Banks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-11-17· cited 5×
- Jarnig v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2013-09-27· cited 3×
- Zinn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1982-12-23· cited 1×
- State v. DeMarcoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2014-04-22
- United States v. ButeD. Utah· 1993-06-18
- Bradshaw Development, Inc. d/b/a Anytime Fitness v. Dep't of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2025-06-26
Cites
73 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 6,512×
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 6,103×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-02-02· cited 3,856×
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court· 1967-06-05· cited 3,591×
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 3,445×
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court· 1977-06-21· cited 2,561×
- Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 2,465×
- United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 2,153×
- United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court· 1950-02-20· cited 2,080×
- McDonald v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-12-20· cited 1,736×
- Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-02-20· cited 1,583×
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court· 1978-05-23· cited 1,428×
- Michigan v. TylerSupreme Court· 1978-05-31· cited 1,386×
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court· 1967-06-05· cited 1,228×
- Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1924-05-05· cited 1,214×
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1958-06-30· cited 919×
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-01-09· cited 885×
- Rios v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-06-27· cited 586×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.