State v. Musser

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the “issue on appeal is whether [the officer] had reasonable suspicion to stop defendant for criminal trespass”
• officer lacked objectively reasonable suspicion to stop the defendant for trespassing because there were no apparent restrictions on public access to the area in which the officer observed the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Musser
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2014-08-28· cited 33×
• State v. Moore
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-07-02· cited 11×
• State v. Ross
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-05-22· cited 10×
• State v. Wampler
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-05-03· cited 7×
• State v. Wiggins
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-04-23· cited 3×
• State v. Maciel-Figueroa
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-08-26· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Ehly
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-01· cited 660×
• State v. Hall
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2005-07-15· cited 336×
• State v. Rodgers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2010-02-11· cited 194×
• State v. Ashbaugh
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2010-12-09· cited 161×
• State v. Belt
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1997-03-06· cited 58×
• State v. Hinton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-11-08· cited 7×