Nebraska Court of Appeals· 9/12/2006
State v. Muse
Citations
- 15 Neb. Ct. App. 13
- 721 N.W.2d 661
- 2006 Neb. App. LEXIS 166
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that endorsement date of clerk either by file stamp or by typed endorsement is what is controlling for purposes of speedy trial statute
- to preserve claimed error in admission of evidence, litigant must make timely Decisions of the Nebraska Court of Appeals 834 22 NEBRASKA APPELLATE REPORTS objection which specifies ground of objection and may not assert different ground on appeal
- not designated for permanent publication
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Irwin, Moore, Cassel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. EppNebraska Supreme Court· 2009-10-16· cited 102×
- State v. RueggeNebraska Court of Appeals· 2013-09-10· cited 8×
- State v. MuseNebraska Supreme Court· 2007-02-23· cited 1×
- In re Estate of FilsingerNebraska Court of Appeals· 2021-05-04· cited 1×
- State v. MuciaNebraska Court of Appeals· 2015-03-31
- State v. SchallerNebraska Court of Appeals· 2022-05-03
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. HessNebraska Supreme Court· 2001-03-09· cited 160×
- State v. JacobNebraska Supreme Court· 1998-02-13· cited 139×
- State v. BakerNebraska Supreme Court· 2002-11-01· cited 94×
- State v. JacksonNebraska Supreme Court· 1987-07-02· cited 57×
- State v. CoxNebraska Supreme Court· 1989-03-17· cited 56×
- State v. TimmermanNebraska Supreme Court· 1992-02-28· cited 40×
- State v. GarzaNebraska Supreme Court· 1990-08-31· cited 27×
- Sherard v. StateNebraska Supreme Court· 1993-12-17· cited 21×
- Ludwig v. Board of County Com'rs of Sarpy CountyNebraska Supreme Court· 1960-06-24· cited 21×
- State v. LongNebraska Supreme Court· 2002-06-14· cited 17×
- State v. WyattNebraska Supreme Court· 1990-02-02· cited 11×
- TCF Banking & Savings, F.A. v. Loft Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1989-05-16· cited 10×
- State v. BrayNebraska Supreme Court· 1993-07-23· cited 6×
- Langford v. StateNebraska Supreme Court· 1925-12-31· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.