Supreme Court of Connecticut· 9/12/2000
State v. Murphy
Citations
- 254 Conn. 561
- 757 A.2d 1125
- 2000 Conn. LEXIS 291
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- construing § 53a-183 [a][2], which uses nearly identical terms, not to regulate letters' content but rather harassing mailing thereof
- ‘‘§ 53a-183 [a] [2] proscribes harassing conduct via mail and does not seek to regulate the content of communications made by mail’’
- § 53a-183 proscribes harassing conduct of send- ing mail, not content of mail
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Palmer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. MerriamSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-07-15· cited 88×
- State v. SaundersSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-01-13· cited 57×
- State v. CharlesConnecticut Appellate Court· 2003-07-22· cited 20×
- State v. BrooksConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-03-22· cited 18×
- State v. HopkinsConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-04-10· cited 17×
- State v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-09-04· cited 11×
- State v. AdgersConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-05-08· cited 10×
- State v. MoultonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-04-13· cited 9×
- State v. SCOTT LaFONTAINEConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-05-10· cited 6×
- State v. ReedConnecticut Appellate Court· 2017-09-19· cited 6×
- Smolicz v. Borough/Town of NaugatuckSecond Circuit· 2008-06-12· cited 2×
- State v. BookConnecticut Appellate Court· 2015-03-03
- State v. NowackiConnecticut Appellate Court· 2015-03-10
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court· 1970-11-23· cited 9,465×
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court· 1983-04-20· cited 5,562×
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
- 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court· 1996-05-13· cited 685×
- Wisconsin v. MitchellSupreme Court· 1993-06-11· cited 552×
- State v. PrioleauSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-08-22· cited 166×
- Charles Mozzochi v. Richard S. Borden, Jr., Paul J. Gibbons, Richard S. Borden, Jr., Paul J. Gibbons, Town of GlastonburySecond Circuit· 1992-03-19· cited 142×
- State v. DenbySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-12-05· cited 123×
- State v. FigueroaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-08-15· cited 114×
- State v. DecaroSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-02-29· cited 92×
- Mary Gormley v. Director, Connecticut State Department of Probation and Attorney General of the State of ConnecticutSecond Circuit· 1980-12-01· cited 66×
- State v. DelgadoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-02-09· cited 54×
- State v. AlbertSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-05-04· cited 44×
- Mary Gormley v. Director, Connecticut State Department of Adult ProbationSupreme Court· 1980-12-01· cited 38×
- State v. WoodsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-10-12· cited 27×
- State v. LewtanConnecticut Appellate Court· 1985-08-27· cited 19×
- State v. SnyderConnecticut Appellate Court· 1998-08-04· cited 16×
- State v. BellConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-10-26· cited 9×
- State v. StephensSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-06-15· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.