State v. Munson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• law of the case doctrine does not apply to bench trials, therefore the State is not required to prove all the alternatives alleged in the information

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Benitez
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-06-11· cited 26×
• State of Washington v. Benjamin Eric Stutzke
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2018-03-22· cited 5×
• State Of Washington v. Kenneth Alfred Linville, Jr.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2017-06-27· cited 3×
• State of Washington v. Lars Ronson Braun
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2022-01-20· cited 1×
• State Of Washington v. Talyn K.j. Benitez
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-06-11

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Hickman
  Washington Supreme Court· 1998-04-30· cited 278×
• State v. Dixon
  Washington Supreme Court· 1971-01-14· cited 99×
• State v. Alvarez
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-03-15· cited 37×
• State v. Doogan
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1996-06-03· cited 32×
• State v. Ford
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1983-01-31· cited 21×
• State v. Pauling
  Washington Supreme Court· 2003-05-22· cited 21×