Skip to main content

State v. Mullins

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 421

Syllabus

APPELLATE REVIEW/CRIMINAL – SENTENCING – R.C. 2953.08(G)(2) – CONSTITUTIONAL LAW/CRIMINAL – DUE PROCESS: Because defendant failed to affirmatively demonstrate the trial court did not consider the purposes of felony sentencing and the seriousness and recidivism factors, this court presumes the trial court considered them. The trial court did not violate defendant's constitutional right to due process because it did not consider the testimony regarding uncharged instances of abuse in determining its sentence.

Judges: Bergeron

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.