State v. Mullins
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 421
Syllabus
APPELLATE REVIEW/CRIMINAL – SENTENCING – R.C. 2953.08(G)(2) – CONSTITUTIONAL LAW/CRIMINAL – DUE PROCESS: Because defendant failed to affirmatively demonstrate the trial court did not consider the purposes of felony sentencing and the seriousness and recidivism factors, this court presumes the trial court considered them. The trial court did not violate defendant's constitutional right to due process because it did not consider the testimony regarding uncharged instances of abuse in determining its sentence.
Judges: Bergeron
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. LongOhio Supreme Court· 1978-02-15· cited 3,848×
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court· 2002-01-09· cited 2,256×
- State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
- State v. TidmoreOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-04-25· cited 17×
- State v. MountsOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-10-25· cited 9×
- State v. FisselOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-06-03· cited 8×
- State v. SowdersOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-12-13· cited 8×
- State v. MimesOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-07-21· cited 7×
- State v. IllingOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-11-30· cited 4×
- State v. ShawOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-09-13· cited 4×
- State v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-06-23· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.