State v. Mulligan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the impact on a victim’s family was already reflected in the standard range punishment for first degree murder because the “devastating impact of all such crimes was equally foreseeable by the Legislature when it set the standard range for first degree murder”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Burkins
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-03-15· cited 83×
• State v. Chanthabouly
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2011-09-27· cited 25×
• State of Washington v. Matthew Henry DeVore
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2018-03-08· cited 13×
• State v. Abdi-Issa
  Washington Supreme Court· 2022-02-17· cited 7×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Manussier
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-08-08· cited 269×
• State v. Ritchie
  Washington Supreme Court· 1995-05-11· cited 160×
• State v. Oxborrow
  Washington Supreme Court· 1986-08-14· cited 152×
• State v. Johnson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1994-05-26· cited 133×
• State v. Barnes
  Washington Supreme Court· 2003-04-07· cited 127×
• State v. Grewe
  Washington Supreme Court· 1991-08-01· cited 111×
• State v. Ross
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1994-10-28· cited 84×
• State v. Scott
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1993-12-27· cited 67×
• State v. Bryan
  Washington Supreme Court· 1980-02-21· cited 58×
• State v. Freitag
  Washington Supreme Court· 1995-06-22· cited 53×
• State v. Barnes
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1990-08-07· cited 26×
• State v. Cuevas-Diaz
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1991-07-15· cited 18×