State v. Mullen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in interpreting statutes the court cannot “rely on any statements made by legislators after passage of the bill regarding the ‘motives of members ... in enacting [the] law.’” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Pugliese
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1980-11-13· cited 54×
• Appeal of Concord Natural Gas Corp.
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1981-08-05· cited 34×
• King v. Sununu
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1985-03-27· cited 19×
• Stephen E. Forster d/b/a Forster's Christmas Tree Farm & Gift Shoppe v. Town of Henniker
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2015-06-12· cited 13×
• State v. Peabody
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1981-12-08· cited 12×
• City of Concord v. Public Employee Labor Relations Board
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1979-10-12· cited 10×
• Cummings v. Bostwick
  D. New Hampshire· 1980-01-02· cited 6×
• Bradley Real Estate Trust v. Taylor
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1986-08-12· cited 3×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Wentworth
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1978-12-06· cited 74×
• Corson v. Brown Products, Inc.
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1979-01-31· cited 38×
• State v. Burroughs
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1973-01-31· cited 26×
• State v. Dean
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1975-09-30· cited 21×
• State v. Valrand
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1961-12-27· cited 13×
• State v. Greenwood
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1975-03-31· cited 7×
• State v. Smith
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1979-08-20· cited 4×
• State v. Dysart
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1978-10-30· cited 2×