Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1/31/1973
State v. Burroughs
Citations
- 113 N.H. 21
- 300 A.2d 315
- 1973 N.H. LEXIS 189
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that language in a driving while intoxicated (DWI) statute requiring a mandatory sentence did not prevent a trial court from exercising its \well-established discretionary authority to suspend\ sentences in the absence of clear language prohibiting suspension or deferral
- holding that language in a driving while intoxicated (DWI) statute requiring a mandatory sentence did not prevent a trial court from exercising its \well-established discretionary authority to suspend\ sentences in the absence of clear language prohibiting suspension or deferral
- holding that language in a driving while intoxicated (DWI
- holding that language in a driving while intoxicated (DWI
- recognizing need for “options to adapt [a] sentence to a particular individual in the manner best suited to accomplish the constitutional objectives”
- “[T]he legislature has demonstrated in many instances its accord with the principle of judicial discretion in the sentencing of those found guilty of crime.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lampron
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BirdWashington Supreme Court· 1980-12-31· cited 42×
- Silva v. BotschSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1980-09-10· cited 41×
- State v. AddisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2013-11-06· cited 32×
- State v. DeanSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1975-09-30· cited 21×
- State v. IngersonSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1987-12-04· cited 16×
- State v. FerbertSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1973-05-31· cited 13×
- State v. W.J.T. Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1992-12-18· cited 13×
- State v. MullenSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1979-08-20· cited 12×
- Hayes v. LeBlancSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1974-02-28· cited 9×
- State v. MoranSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2009-01-29· cited 9×
- State v. GibbonsSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1992-03-13· cited 9×
- State v. ThayerSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1978-11-30· cited 7×
- State v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1975-03-31· cited 7×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1979-08-20· cited 4×
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2013-03-13· cited 3×
- State v. McMillanSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1974-08-26· cited 2×
- State v. TimmonsSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2000-07-05· cited 2×
- State v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1985-02-15· cited 1×
- State v. City CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-12-02
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court· 1916-12-04· cited 540×
- State v. DouglasArizona Supreme Court· 1960-02-17· cited 46×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. McGinnis v. AsheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1938-05-09· cited 33×
- Plymouth School District v. State Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1972-03-24· cited 26×
- State v. ValrandSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1961-12-27· cited 13×
- Ouletta v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1969-06-02· cited 5×
- State v. BergeSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1969-10-31· cited 3×
- New Castle v. RandSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1959-02-27· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.