State v. Muldrew

Citations

• 2018 Ohio 4883

Syllabus

The trial court did not err by not merging Appellant's convictions. Also, it cannot be concluded that the trial court's consecutive sentence findings are clearly and convincingly not supported by the record, and, further, there is no basis upon which to conclude that the trial court at sentencing did not appropriately consider Appellant's mental health. Finally, Appellant, by pleading guilty, waived any error regarding the trial court's determination that he was competent to stand trial, but, even if this were not so, the record reveals no error relating to this issue. Judgment affirmed.