State v. Mughni
Citations
- 185 N.E.3d 678
- 2022 Ohio 626
Syllabus
SPEEDY TRIAL: The trial court did not err in dismissing the charges against defendant for violation of his right to a speedy trial where the length of delay between the filing of the arrest warrant and the formal indictment was eight-and-a-half months, the state made no effort to execute the arrest warrant during the delay, defendant timely invoked his right to a speedy trial, and the trial court made the factual finding that defendant suffered prejudice because of the delay.
Judges: Bergeron
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1992-06-24· cited 3,106×
- State ex rel. Zollner v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court· 1993-05-19· cited 134×
- United States v. Charles J. JacksonSixth Circuit· 2007-01-12· cited 98×
- State v. MeekerOhio Supreme Court· 1971-03-31· cited 76×
- United States v. Curtis Delmont WoolfolkFourth Circuit· 2005-03-02· cited 70×
- United States v. Clarke Dana JohnsonFirst Circuit· 1978-07-28· cited 20×
- State v. GageCourt of Appeals of Ohio, First District, Hamilton County· 2018-01-26· cited 10×
- State v. MuhammadelOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-03· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.