State v. Mozell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• issue inadequately briefed when defendant cited two cases without analysis or attempt to analogize and failed to address factors used to determine whether defendant’s right to speedy trial was violated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Prioleau
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-08-22· cited 166×
• State v. Barnett
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1999-06-01· cited 34×
• State v. Williams
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1996-04-30· cited 26×
• State v. Wall
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1996-03-19· cited 22×
• State v. Marsala
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1996-11-12· cited 20×
• State v. Miranda
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1996-05-14· cited 16×
• State v. Silva
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1996-11-05· cited 8×
• State v. Mozell
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-06-19

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Barker v. Wingo
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
• State v. Whelan
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-08-05· cited 393×
• California v. Tyberg
  Supreme Court· 1986-12-01· cited 383×
• State v. Borrelli
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-08-10· cited 105×
• State v. Woodson
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-08-03· cited 94×
• State v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-06-28· cited 58×
• Latham & Associates, Inc. v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-04-09· cited 54×
• State v. Davis
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-04-17· cited 24×