Oregon Supreme Court· 4/29/2010

State v. Moyer

Citations

230 P.3d 7
348 Or. 220
2010 Ore. LEXIS 277

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that the question of historical exception “requires the following inquiries: (1) was the restriction well established when the early American guarantees of freedom of expression were adopted, and (2
explaining that the question of historical exception “requires the following inquiries: (1) was the restriction well established when the early American guarantees of freedom of expression were adopted, and (2) was Article I, section 8, intended to eliminate that restriction”
upholding Arizona’s exclusion of mental illness evidence offered to refute the mens rea element, unless such evidence is sufficient to establish an insanity defense
noting “Blackstone’s observations that providing false iden- tifying information to governmental officials or public bod- ies were sanctionable offenses” (citing William Blackstone, 4 Commentaries on the Laws of England -42 (1769))
statute prohibiting making a campaign contribution in a false name fell within the first Robertson category because “the falsity that the statute prohibits can only be achieved through expression — through one person’s communication of a falsehood to another person”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: De Muniz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.