Supreme Court of South Carolina· 10/25/1978
State v. Moultrie
Citations
- 248 S.E.2d 486
- 271 S.C. 526
- 1978 S.C. LEXIS 366
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “a hotel manager may not effectively consent to a search of a guest’s room”
- in a case where defendant was living rent-free with a homeowner’s daughter, the homeowner could validly consent to search of the defendant’s room
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ness, Lewis, Rhodes, Gregory, JJ', Littlejohn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BaileySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-02-04· cited 39×
- Knight v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-01-23· cited 19×
- State v. LoftinSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-02-18· cited 16×
- State v. PressleySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-03-12· cited 15×
- Goins v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-05-16· cited 13×
- State v. FlowersCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-06-21· cited 9×
- State v. BrockmanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-11-17· cited 6×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court· 1974-02-20· cited 3,648×
- Stoner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1964-05-18· cited 1,576×
- Frazier v. CuppSupreme Court· 1969-04-23· cited 1,468×
- Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1961-04-03· cited 891×
- State v. MiddletonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-02-26· cited 19×
- United States v. WhiteDistrict of Columbia· 1966-12-19· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.