Ohio Court of Appeals· 10/27/2023

State v. Morgan

Citations

2023 Ohio 3913

Syllabus

Appellant's sentence was not contrary to law it fell within the range provided by statute and the trial court stated both at the sentencing hearing and in its judgment entry that it had considered the principles and purposes of sentencing set forth in R.C. 2929.11 and then balanced the seriousness and recidivism factors under R.C. 2929.12. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Lewis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. McCoy
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-01-12· cited 8×
State v. Masters
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-05-16· cited 2×
State v. Woodfork
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-07-03· cited 1×
State v. Kendrick
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-04-27
State v. Nation
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-05-29

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Foster
Ohio Supreme Court· 2006-02-27· cited 3,571×
State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
State v. Brown
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-11-03· cited 113×
State v. Haines
Ohio Supreme Court· 2006-12-28· cited 79×
State v. Pawlak
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-09-22· cited 75×
State v. Trent
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-10-15· cited 18×
State v. Benedict
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-26· cited 12×
State v. Myers
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-04· cited 4×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.