Skip to main content

State v. Morgan

Citations

  • 160 S.W.3d 1
  • 2004 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 818
  • 2003 WL 22107912

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • granting review, on its own motion, regarding whether article 44.01 authorized the State’s appeal and holding that the State’s appeal was interlocutory for which appellate courts have no jurisdiction
  • discussing penal code section 49.09 as one of two “statutes providing for potentially increased punishment in the case of a person’s second offense of driving while intoxicated” (emphasis added)
  • discussing penal code section 49.09 as one of two \statutes providing for potentially increased punishment in the case of a person's second offense of driving while intoxicated\ (emphasis added)
  • granting review, on its own motion, regarding whether article 44.01 authorized the State‘s appeal and holding that the State‘s appeal was interlocutory for which appellate courts have no jurisdiction
  • “The order does not force an alteration of the information before trial can proceed. Instead, it forces the State to alter the information before trial can proceed in the manner in which the State chooses.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keasler, Meyers, Price, Womack, Johnson, Hervey, Holcomb, Cochran, Keller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.