Skip to main content

State v. Morgan

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 3018

Syllabus

The municipal abused its discretion by (1) imposing a recurring probation fee because the court itself (as opposed to its probation department) was supervising the probation, and (2) ordering the defendant to abstain from alcohol, drugs, and marijuana because nothing in the record indicated these substances played a role in the defendant's commission of theft.

Judges: Siebert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.