State v. Moreno

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deferring to the trial court’s determination that uncorroborated hearsay evidence was sufficiently reliable to warrant consideration in a sentencing proceeding
• “Whether information in the pre-sentence report is reliable is largely within the discretion of the trial court and is generally admissible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hargrave
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2010-06-14· cited 65×
• State v. Ives
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1996-11-07· cited 63×
• State v. Taylor
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1991-09-17· cited 37×
• State v. Fernane
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-11-01· cited 10×
• State of Arizona v. Juan Manuel Molina
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2005-08-30

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Nash
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1985-01-09· cited 279×
• State v. Jeffers
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-01-24· cited 217×
• United States v. Frank Viserto, Jr., Richard Rocco, Joseph Solce, Garnet Johnson, Sarah Payne, Howard Williams and Prentiss Covington
  Second Circuit· 1979-03-21· cited 129×
• Rose v. Florida
  Supreme Court· 1985-06-03· cited 120×
• State v. Benge
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1974-04-04· cited 56×
• State v. Marquez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-08-19· cited 24×
• State v. Ashelman
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-09-27· cited 19×
• State v. McDaniel
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1980-09-11· cited 18×
• Mont v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-06· cited 15×
• State v. May
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-08-23· cited 13×
• Brighton Building & Maintenance Co. v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 1×
• Viserto v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 1×