State v. Moore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• continuance motion hearings are not hearings at which defendant's appearance is required under CrR 3.4(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Elliott Bay Adjustment Co., Inc., Res. v. Caren Dacumos
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2017-08-21
• State of Washington v. Zane Eugene Lumpkin
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2025-07-01

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. MacK
  Washington Supreme Court· 1978-03-09· cited 101×
• State v. Ford
  Washington Supreme Court· 1988-06-02· cited 98×
• State v. George
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-06-07· cited 61×
• State v. Chhom
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-12-13· cited 49×
• City of Seattle v. Guay
  Washington Supreme Court· 2003-09-11· cited 39×
• State v. Kindsvogel
  Washington Supreme Court· 2003-06-05· cited 38×
• State v. Ginn
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-08-09· cited 38×
• City of Bellevue v. Jacke
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-06-21· cited 19×
• State v. Chavez-Romero
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2012-09-11· cited 19×
• State v. Branstetter
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-02-18· cited 12×
• State v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1989-12-18· cited 12×
• State v. Raschka
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-11-09· cited 10×
• State v. Tolles
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-05-14· cited 3×