State v. Kindsvogel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the offenses must share \close logical and temporal proximity\ and applying the same definition of \same criminal episode\ that applies in the mandatory joinder context
• while prevailing party need not cross-appeal, it is required to assign error to challenged findings
• construing former CrR 3.3 (2000)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).