Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 7/18/2017
State v. Moore
Citations
- 803 S.E.2d 196
- 254 N.C. App. 544
- 2017 WL 3027283
- 2017 N.C. App. LEXIS 567
Syllabus
Judge's comment not an order or judgment - denial of continuance - no prejudice in admission of video
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the video was not properly authenticated in part because no testimony was presented about “whether the video accurately depicted events that [a witness] had observed”
- addressing prejudice immediately after ruling the trial court erred in admitting video surveillance on authentication grounds
- summarizing other evidence presented on the same issue as a piece of evidence admitted in error to determine whether there was prejudice from the error in admitting the one piece of evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Zachary
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.