Skip to main content

State v. Moore

Citations

  • 803 S.E.2d 196
  • 254 N.C. App. 544
  • 2017 WL 3027283
  • 2017 N.C. App. LEXIS 567

Syllabus

Judge's comment not an order or judgment - denial of continuance - no prejudice in admission of video

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the video was not properly authenticated in part because no testimony was presented about “whether the video accurately depicted events that [a witness] had observed”
  • addressing prejudice immediately after ruling the trial court erred in admitting video surveillance on authentication grounds
  • summarizing other evidence presented on the same issue as a piece of evidence admitted in error to determine whether there was prejudice from the error in admitting the one piece of evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zachary

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.