Skip to main content

State v. Moore

Citations

  • 902 A.2d 1212
  • 188 N.J. 182

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that hypnotically refreshed testimony \cannot meet the general acceptance standard of admissibility\ despite being deemed admissible twenty-five years earlier
  • holding that hypnotically refreshed testimony of witness is generally inadmissible in criminal trials
  • holding that hypnotically refreshed testimony of witness is generally inadmissible in criminal trials
  • noting that when balance of competing interests between crime victim and defendant is struck, “greatest protection goes to a criminal defendant whose liberty interest is at stake”
  • noting that when balance of competing interests between crime victim and defendant is struck, \greatest protection goes to a criminal defendant whose liberty interest is at stake\
  • applying the Frye test in a criminal context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Poritz, Rivera-Soto

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.