Supreme Court of New Jersey· 8/21/2006
State v. Moore
Citations
- 902 A.2d 1212
- 188 N.J. 182
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that hypnotically refreshed testimony \cannot meet the general acceptance standard of admissibility\ despite being deemed admissible twenty-five years earlier
- holding that hypnotically refreshed testimony of witness is generally inadmissible in criminal trials
- holding that hypnotically refreshed testimony of witness is generally inadmissible in criminal trials
- noting that when balance of competing interests between crime victim and defendant is struck, “greatest protection goes to a criminal defendant whose liberty interest is at stake”
- noting that when balance of competing interests between crime victim and defendant is struck, \greatest protection goes to a criminal defendant whose liberty interest is at stake\
- applying the Frye test in a criminal context
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Poritz, Rivera-Soto
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HendersonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2011-08-24· cited 487×
- New Jersey Department of Children & Families v. A.L.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2013-02-06· cited 271×
- State v. ChenSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2011-08-24· cited 40×
- State v. MeansSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2007-07-11· cited 25×
- State v. CulverConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-09-05· cited 15×
- State v. MahonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-09-12· cited 11×
- Phillips v. GelpkeSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2007-05-17· cited 9×
- State v. PearsonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-09-12· cited 7×
- State v. KingNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2007-02-06· cited 6×
- State v. SharpNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2006-12-05· cited 5×
- United States v. D.W.B.Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2015-02-26· cited 4×
- State v. ChenNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2008-07-31· cited 3×
- United States v. BurrisNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2015-02-26
- State of New Jersey v. Rolando TerrellNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2017-11-29
- State of New Jersey v. Darryl NievesNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2023-09-13
- State v. Darryl Nieves; State v. Michael CifelliSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2025-11-20
Cites
44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 8,442×
- Frye v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
- Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court· 1987-06-22· cited 2,329×
- People v. ShirleyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1982-03-11· cited 314×
- State v. HurdSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1981-07-14· cited 277×
- State v. HarveySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1997-07-30· cited 272×
- State v. MacKSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-05-16· cited 207×
- State v. DeatoreSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1976-04-13· cited 175×
- People v. GuerraCalifornia Supreme Court· 1984-11-21· cited 173×
- Clarence Moore v. Willis Morton, Administrator Peter G. Verniero, Attorney General of the State of New JerseyThird Circuit· 2001-06-22· cited 148×
- State v. MenaArizona Supreme Court· 1981-02-03· cited 122×
- House v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1984-01-25· cited 121×
- Rubanick v. Witco Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1991-08-01· cited 118×
- Harding v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-10-09· cited 113×
- State v. BuonadonnaSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1991-01-08· cited 105×
- Commonwealth v. KaterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1983-03-23· cited 100×
- State v. HarveySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1990-10-18· cited 97×
- State v. IwakiriIdaho Supreme Court· 1984-05-07· cited 90×
- State v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-09-08· cited 89×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.