Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 4/30/1973
State v. Moody
Citations
- 113 N.H. 191
- 304 A.2d 374
- 1973 N.H. LEXIS 233
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- evidence of amount paid to defendant for stolen item is relevant to determination of value
- proper for jury to reject all figures presented as to valuation and make their own determination of market value of stolen item based on evidence presented
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Griffith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. GartnerNebraska Supreme Court· 2002-02-08· cited 146×
- Commonwealth v. HanesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-03-09· cited 44×
- People v. McCoySupreme Court of Colorado· 1988-11-14· cited 24×
- State v. WarrenSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1974-03-29· cited 8×
- State v. KellySupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1984-09-27· cited 7×
- State v. HammellSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1986-12-08· cited 6×
- State v. TunnellNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1982-11-23· cited 2×
- El Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. Ayala GarcíaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 2005-02-25· cited 1×
- El Pueblo De Puerto Rico v. Gerardo Ayala GarcíaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 2005-02-25· cited 1×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.