State v. Montoya State v. Yap

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that prisoners under 9 sentence of life with the possibility of parole are entitled to the benefit of the tolling provision
• holding that prisoners under sentence of life 11 with the possibility of parole are entitled to the benefit of the tolling provision
• holding § 352.1(a) is applicable 27 to prisoners serving a sentence of life with the possibility of parole, but the statutory language 28 excludes those sentenced to life without the possibility of parole
• holding § 352.1(a) is applicable 16 to prisoners serving a sentence of life with the possibility of parole, but the statutory language 17 excludes those sentenced to life without the possibility of parole
• holding § 1 352.1(a) is applicable to prisoners serving a sentence of life with the possibility of parole, but the 2 statutory language excludes those sentenced to life without the possibility of parole
• holding § 352.1(a) is applicable 25 to prisoners serving a sentence of life with the possibility of parole, but the statutory language 26 excludes those sentenced to life without the possibility of parole

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).