Skip to main content

State v. Montgomery

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 4030

Syllabus

MOTION TO SUPPRESS – CUSTODIAL INTERROGATION – MIRANDA – R.C. 2935.03: Where defendant voluntarily arrived on the scene and approached the officers, was not handcuffed, was questioned on a sidewalk outside his home, and voluntarily answered officers' questions, and where the officers did not engage in coercive tactics, intimidation, or threaten defendant, defendant was not subject to a custodial interrogation. Where defendant was not subject to a custodial interrogation, Miranda warnings were not required and the trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion to suppress.

Judges: Myers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.