State v. Montgomery
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 4030
Syllabus
MOTION TO SUPPRESS – CUSTODIAL INTERROGATION – MIRANDA – R.C. 2935.03: Where defendant voluntarily arrived on the scene and approached the officers, was not handcuffed, was questioned on a sidewalk outside his home, and voluntarily answered officers' questions, and where the officers did not engage in coercive tactics, intimidation, or threaten defendant, defendant was not subject to a custodial interrogation. Where defendant was not subject to a custodial interrogation, Miranda warnings were not required and the trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion to suppress.
Judges: Myers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. GrantOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-08-07· cited 15×
- State v. HallOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-16· cited 5×
- State v. MorrisOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-11-15· cited 3×
- State v. RobertsOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-04-26· cited 2×
- State v. CurryOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-11-20· cited 1×
- State v. OlanOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-04-03
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court· 2003-10-22· cited 2,261×
- Cleveland v. Oles (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2017-07-19· cited 54×
- State v. DurganOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-06-15· cited 17×
- State v. HillOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-08-08· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.