State v. Montgomery

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e join the majority of courts that have found scienter is not required for violations of the securities registration and licensing requirements.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Gary L. Schall
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2014-10-29· cited 44×
• State v. Wallace
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2005-10-14· cited 30×
• State v. Andresen
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-05-29· cited 23×
• Cox v. Garvin
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2005-01-10· cited 7×
• State v. Wilson
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2023-08-18· cited 7×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Getz v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
  Supreme Court· 1977-10-03· cited 234×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,804 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Universal Major Industries Corp., Arthur J. Homans
  Second Circuit· 1976-12-16· cited 89×
• Volk v. Baldazo
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1982-08-27· cited 77×
• Securities & Exchange Commission v. Softpoint, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1997-03-20· cited 57×
• State v. Hagerman Water Right Owners, Inc.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1997-09-10· cited 42×
• State v. Shama Resources Ltd. Partnership
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1995-07-26· cited 38×
• State v. Goetz
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1981-10-23· cited 37×
• City of Sun Valley v. Sun Valley Co.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1996-02-21· cited 33×
• State v. Hodge
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1969-11-08· cited 33×
• Securities & Exchange Commission v. Cavanagh
  S.D. New York· 1998-04-20· cited 24×
• State v. Kreminski
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-06-26· cited 20×
• People v. Morrow
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1983-11-10· cited 15×
• Securities & Exchange Commission v. Parkersburg Wireless Ltd. Liability Co.
  District of Columbia· 1997-12-10· cited 10×