Securities & Exchange Commission v. Softpoint, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the same factors in the context of a preliminary injunction under I.R.C. § 7407
• precluding last-minute testimony from defendant and noting that defendant, despite ample time and opportunity to do so, failed to seek the court’s assistance in accommodating his Fifth Amendment concerns
• finding liability where involvement was clearly necessary and substantial and not simply “de minimus”
• precluding litigant from introducing affidavits to oppose a motion for sum- raary judgment where he “provided no firm commitment that he actually [would] submit to deposition should the Court accept his affidavits opposing summary judgment”
• finding defendant’s culpability confirmed by three-year duration of his participation in various financial manipulations
• granting summary judgment on insider trading claim against consultant who was a “corporate insider”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).