Arizona Supreme Court· 7/28/1983
State v. Montano
Citations
- 136 Ariz. 605
- 667 P.2d 1320
- 1983 Ariz. LEXIS 223
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding it was not an of abuse discretion to refuse to dismiss a jury panel after the entire panel heard a prejudicial remark because each juror confirmed that they could remain fair and impartial
- interests of justice did not dictate excusing entire jury panel after one juror made potentially prejudicial remark, was excused, and court questioned remaining jurors about impartiality
- interests of justice did not dictate excusing entire jury panel after one juror made potentially prejudicial remark, was excused, and court 13 questioned remaining jurors about impartiality
- multiple hearsay not admissible unless hearsay exception applicable to each part
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cameron, Feldman, Gordon, Hays, Holohan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. ClabourneArizona Supreme Court· 1984-10-31· cited 112×
- State v. PolandArizona Supreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 109×
- State v. SloverCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-02-09· cited 31×
- State v. SparksArizona Supreme Court· 1985-10-17· cited 15×
- People v. MartinezColorado Court of Appeals· 2000-10-12· cited 14×
- State v. MontanoArizona Supreme Court· 1983-07-28· cited 11×
- English-Clark v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-06-25· cited 7×
- State of Arizona v. Robert Leeroy SloverCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-02-09
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.