Court of Appeals of Arizona· 12/20/1977
State v. Molina
Citations
- 573 P.2d 528
- 117 Ariz. 454
- 1977 Ariz. App. LEXIS 770
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- in paternity proceeding, stipulation by prosecution, defendant, and counsel, or witness and counsel, a precondition to admissibility, subject to judicial discretion
- although paternity action is not a criminal proceeding, same standards apply to polygraph evidence, requiring written stipulation of parties for admission
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Richmond, Howard, Hathaway
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ValdezArizona Supreme Court· 1962-05-23· cited 193×
- Commonwealth v. a JuvenileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1974-06-12· cited 123×
- United States v. RidlingE.D. Michigan· 1972-10-06· cited 91×
- State v. DorseyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1975-07-31· cited 89×
- United States v. Bruce Eugene De BethamNinth Circuit· 1973-02-12· cited 55×
- United States v. ZeigerDistrict of Columbia· 1972-10-10· cited 47×
- United States v. DeBethamS.D. California· 1972-09-08· cited 42×
- State v. GoldsmithArizona Supreme Court· 1975-11-19· cited 36×
- State v. AldereteNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1974-02-27· cited 22×
- Associated Builders, Inc. v. StovallArizona Supreme Court· 1967-03-01· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.