State v. Mock
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 3667
Syllabus
Motion for leave to file delayed motion for a new trial newly discovered evidence abuse of discretion Crim.R. 33(B) unavoidably prevented. Appellant failed to demonstrate that the trial court abused its discretion in finding that appellant was not unavoidably prevented from discovering either the notes containing jury questions and the court's answers or the claimed evidence of Brady violations within the time provided by Crim.R. 33(B).
Judges: Celebrezze
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Lansdowne v. Beacon Journal Publishing Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 1987-09-02· cited 147×
- C. Miller Chevrolet, Inc. v. City of Willoughby HillsOhio Supreme Court· 1974-06-26· cited 145×
- Hungler v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court· 1986-08-13· cited 48×
- State v. DuesOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-07-27· cited 24×
- State v. HaleOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-05-16· cited 19×
- State v. HillOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-01-16· cited 18×
- State v. GrayOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-05-02· cited 12×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-05-09· cited 10×
- State v. YatesOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-09-29· cited 7×
- State v. BlandaOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-05-27· cited 7×
- State v. MockOhio Supreme Court· 2018-06-06· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.