State v. Gray
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 1638
Syllabus
Abuse of discretion Crim.R. 33(B) motion for leave to file a new trial newly discovered evidence unavoidably prevented from discovering evidence clear and convincing proof alibi is not newly discovered evidence self-serving affidavits. There was no abuse of discretion when the trial court denied defendant's motion for leave to file a new trial. Defendant failed to establish, by clear and convincing evidence, that he was unavoidably prevented from discovering the new evidence within the timeframe prescribed by Crim.R. 33(B).
Judges: Headen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HillOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-01-16· cited 18×
- State v. HaleOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-10-26· cited 10×
- State v. MurphyOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-11-04· cited 4×
- State v. DowellOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-03· cited 2×
- State v. MockOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-07-09· cited 1×
- State v. GrayOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-10-14· cited 1×
- State v. GrayOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-06-09· cited 1×
- State v. HaleOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-10-05· cited 1×
- State v. HoustonOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-10-26
- State v. MaloneOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-10-31
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.