Skip to main content

State v. Mock

Citations

  • 2017 Ohio 8866

Syllabus

R.C. 2953.08 contrary to law R.C. 2929.14 R.C. 2929.11 R.C. 2929.12 clerical error Crim.R. 36 nunc pro tunc entry. Appellant's sentence is not contrary to law. The trial court's sentencing journal entry does not accurately reflect the sentence imposed in open court. Thus, the matter is remanded to the trial court for the limited purpose of issuing a nunc pro tunc sentencing entry.

Judges: Celebrezze

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.