State v. Mock
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 8866
Syllabus
R.C. 2953.08 contrary to law R.C. 2929.14 R.C. 2929.11 R.C. 2929.12 clerical error Crim.R. 36 nunc pro tunc entry. Appellant's sentence is not contrary to law. The trial court's sentencing journal entry does not accurately reflect the sentence imposed in open court. Thus, the matter is remanded to the trial court for the limited purpose of issuing a nunc pro tunc sentencing entry.
Judges: Celebrezze
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. ArnettOhio Supreme Court· 2000-03-15· cited 630×
- State ex rel. Cruzado v. ZaleskiOhio Supreme Court· 2006-11-22· cited 371×
- State v. MillerOhio Supreme Court· 2010-11-30· cited 171×
- State v. HintonOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-11-25· cited 115×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-04-10· cited 90×
- State v. LedbetterOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-01-12· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.