State v. Moats

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “questions from a police officer to a citizen — even questions an ordinary citizen would regard as offensive — do not, by themselves constitute a sufficient show of authority to effect a seizure”
• concluding that officer did not stop defendant by approaching his parked car and stating his concern that defendant might be tres- passing, then asking questions about suspicious behavior of another occupant during the contact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Acuna
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-07-02· cited 9×
• State v. Belle
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-09-21· cited 6×
• State v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-09-06· cited 5×
• State v. McKibben
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-06-02· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Ehly
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-01· cited 660×
• State v. Hall
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2005-07-15· cited 336×
• State v. Rodgers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2010-02-11· cited 194×
• State v. Ashbaugh
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2010-12-09· cited 161×
• State v. Radtke
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-04-20· cited 14×
• State v. Levias
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-04-20· cited 8×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-01-25· cited 7×