Supreme Court of Missouri· 11/20/1906
State v. Mitchell
Citations
- 199 Mo. 105
- 97 S.W. 561
- 1906 Mo. LEXIS 286
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he tribunal [cannot] be considered as lawfully constituted unless the jurors ... take [the] oath”
- \[I]t is everywhere held that the record proper in a criminal appeal must show that the jury was sworn to try the cause\
- \[I]t is everywhere held that the record proper in a criminal appeal must show that the jury was sworn to try the cause\
- \[T]he tribunal [cannot] be considered as lawfully constituted unless the jurors ... take [the] oath\
- “[I]t is everywhere held that the record proper in a criminal appeal must show that the jury was sworn to try the cause”
- Since the jury was not sworn, the conviction was reversed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burgess, Fox, Gantt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HollmanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1958-04-08· cited 48×
- Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-09-11· cited 27×
- State v. VoghCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-02-20· cited 20×
- Alston v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-10-03· cited 19×
- Montgomery v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-07-02· cited 19×
- State v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1969-05-05· cited 11×
- State v. DuffSupreme Court of Missouri· 1913-12-09· cited 9×
- People v. PeltonAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California· 1931-06-20· cited 3×
- State v. HurstMissouri Court of Appeals· 1907-02-04· cited 2×
- State v. McKinneySupreme Court of Missouri· 1909-06-08· cited 2×
- State v. DuncanSupreme Court of Missouri· 1911-11-14· cited 2×
- State v. RandolphMissouri Court of Appeals· 1909-12-06
- State v. DelaneySupreme Court of Missouri· 1913-05-20
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. PotterSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1846-07-15· cited 45×
- Slaughter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1897-03-03· cited 42×
- Hunnel v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1882-11-15· cited 25×
- Zapf v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1895-01-15· cited 5×
- Lyman v. PeopleAppellate Court of Illinois· 1880-12-04· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.